Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1526

reference
236-tree-1
name
1526
tree-preservation-order

undefined

236-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.004324 50.854975)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.004253 50.854967,-1.004256 50.854981,-1.004266 50.854994,-1.004281 50.855004,-1.004301 50.855011,-1.004323 50.855013,-1.004345 50.855011,-1.004365 50.855005,-1.004381 50.854995,-1.004391 50.854982,-1.004395 50.854969,-1.004392 50.854955,-1.004382 50.854942,-1.004366 50.854932,-1.004347 50.854925,-1.004325 50.854923,-1.004303 50.854925,-1.004283 50.854931,-1.004267 50.854941,-1.004256 50.854953,-1.004253 50.854967)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL